Planet Larry

May 13, 2008

Jürgen Geuter

Tiny, portable devices

A few years ago, laptops started getting bigger, eventually becoming replacements for desktops. You paid a premium (compared to a "normal" desktop PC) but you had a laptop that was able to run your games while still being portable. Well ... somewhat portable. Well ... actually not really portable but heavy as hell and often huge.

This spawned a new market of devices, devices like the EEEPC: Those devices are less powerful that what we used to have and cheaper which leads some to think that those devices are for people with less money (we'll come back to that thought soon).

ASUS' new EEEPC well be cheaper when bought with Windows because Microsoft has now announced that they'll give a huge price bonus for those less powerful devices. This is of course to make the linux versions look bad (they'll be more expensive even though they'll offer better hardware for that price).

Now why would Microsoft push so hard to stay on the computers for the "poorer people"? Well they don't really care about that because the market for ultra portable computers that are smaller and lighter is not for the less fortunate but for very tech savvy people that want to be online and browsing even when they go out to get a coffee.

That market is important because it has many of the people that in the long run influence decision making in companies and if that ultra-portable market shows that you don't need windows to have a great desktop that would hurt Windows sales a lot.

Especially with the Vista fiasco and MS desperately trying to get into the positive news headlines by buying Yahoo they just cannot let anything weaken the gospel: "You need some Windows to have a good desktop, the rest doesn't work and is too complicated."

What we learn from this is that even Microsoft has realized how important the ultra-portable market will become soon and how much money and mindshare it can bring you or lose you.

Personally, I'd love to have one of the EEEPCs but I just bought a new laptop and there's no need to throw away more money for a plaything (I do take donations though ;-) ), but I can see that in a few months there will be some people with big mindshare in the tech community like some high-profile blogger who just has that one ultra-portable low cost laptop with all his/her stuff running on all kinds of online services. When that happens that means bad news for not only Microsoft but also Apple and other vendors who rely on locking their customers in.

ASUS has screwed up their newest EEEPC because they did not seem to understand their great idea themselves: The new edition sports a bigger display which is neat but also has grown (because they wanted to put all kinds of crap in) way to expensive.

The most reasonable thing to do right now to earn good money is this:


  1. Build a cheap and ultra portable machine that looks cool but that does not have everything in. Don't compromise too much to get millions of hardware features. A 10" display with 1000x600-ish resolution, a processor that gets the browser running at an OK speed, a very good touchpad. 1GB of RAM so you don't need swap to run. Only very little solid state harddrive.

  2. Set up a service that is connected into every aspect of the machine: Allow people to have their "home directory" on your server for backups. Let them pay for it. Allow people to buy all kinds of neat services. Don't get greedy by trying to lock them into one operating system or platform but offer benefits: Build a service that allows people to have their pidgin conversation logs on your server and guarantee backups. Guarantee encryption for their personal data. Do similar stuff for other software (while still keeping the base system free of charge and updates cost-free, too).



Won't take long after you have the first high-profile clients and the word will spread. Ultra-portable done right can be a great business model. It's not for the poorer people but it's about the people with a very mobile lifestyle that thought the MacBook Air was great cause of it's size and weight (until they realized that it's a crappy computer who was rendered useless by all the foul compromises that they took).

P.S. Funny how Microsoft comes to late to the party, again. People build something and get ridiculed by MS until they realize that there's a huge party with a lot of money, then they come storming in and try to bribe everyone to buy their ripped off version. I hope the EU fines them again for this (off topic: Where does the money from the fines go btw.?).

May 13, 2008 03:40 PM :: Germany  

Muhammad Najmi Ahmad Zabidi

Spinning circus

-contacted prospective supervisor. One institution agreed but since I checked with my fellow friend who still carrying his phd there in Western AU he said try to find some other top U.

-waiting for Victoria Wellington Univ's answer. Seems my research interest is there, but Dr Ian is yet to reply. Keep patient.

-QUT. The Dr whom I dealt with said I've to wait first for his friend who now in overseas so that he can discuss with regard to my research interest. Thanks Dr, you're very much did very quick responses!

-Univ of Queensland... hmm nothing much on computer systems instead on security surveillance. But I've to ask them first. Why I insist, since UoQ have a good rank. Second, because I might mislook for the appropriate scholar whom name wasn't there(?).

-contacted UMICH, Univ of Tennessee, Memphis. For UMICH I bet it is almost impossible since the standard is pretty much high. Yet I'm a bit reluctant to take GRE!(haha). But since there are no confirmation yet from the AU/NZ institution, I let my options open.

-Purdue did not require GRE, BUT they did not reply my mail. Perhaps so many good people wanna go to Purdue so my email diverted to junkmail(sob). But it takes 5 years to finish according to their curriculum outline. Owch!

WA.

May 13, 2008 08:56 AM :: Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia  

Zeth

New RSS feed, please update now!

If you have signed up to my site's RSS feed, please update to http://commandline.org.uk/feeds/full/ as soon as possible. Then you will be sure not to miss any of my exciting adventures.

This main feed should work the same as the old one, however, I have provided a number of extra feed options. if that is your bag.

Update: I am hoping all the old feeds should do something now.

May 13, 2008 12:12 AM :: West Midlands, England  

May 12, 2008

Steve Dibb

planet, packages: small bugfixes

I took a few minutes today and cleaned up a few small bugs on Planet Larry and friends.

One thing I get asked for every now and then is if I have archives of past posts. Well, I do now. I just copy the HTML file of the last post to $date one each run. A simple and unelegant solution. I’ll be doing the same thing for Planet Gentoo soon.

Also, fixed the FeedBurner link on the main page — I didn’t even realize it was broken. While I was at it, I created one for Universe as well.

On the packages website, I finally fixed it so you can search against just packages again. That’s been annoying me for a while. By default the search is way too wide, I think. It will search the full atom, the package description and the package name. I have to do the package name twice because of regular expressions (starting with, ending with, exact matches, etc.). And there’s still no simple way to search for packages containing multiple words, which is also an annoying little bug. Advanced searches for GPNL and Packages has been something I’ve wanted to do for a long time, but have been putting off since I started the projects. Sheesh. Every time I sit down and start to poke at it, though, I realize just how big a beast it is, based on what I’d like to accomplish. I really need something for the interim, though.

Anyway, I better quit before this post gets any more boring. One last thing — we can use more users who are Gentoo users and have a blog on Planet Larry. Just drop me an e-mail and I’ll get you setup.

May 12, 2008 11:21 PM :: Utah, USA  

Zeth

How not to program WSGI

or how not to serve robots.txt with PyBlosxom

So as you may have noticed, I moved this site from PyBlosxom to Django, which depending on your perspective is a fabulous thing to do or is tantamount to treason on the high seas. I will explain more about that later.

Old links to the site should, in the main, still work hopefully as I have done some regular expressions jujitsu which should hopefully send everyone to where they were supposed to be going.

However, some posts and comments will have their formatting up the creek. So I want the old version of the site to be available (at archive.commandline.org.uk) for a while longer.

Because the archived version is deprecated and on the way out, I do not want the search engines to index it. Therefore I needed to make a robots.txt file for that subdomain excluding them from indexing it.

The last version of this site, like many dynamic sites, is composed of a number of layers, part of which was a lot of my own nonsense code doing various things. Ignoring that, when a request for a packet came in it would go to WSGI which would then pass the request on to PyBlosxom which was at the bottom of it all doing the hard work.

To deploy it properly, one would normally put Apache at the front as well, but I never got around to that. In theory this is a bad thing to do. But in practice it worked really well without the huge and complicated server that is Apache in the mix. It actually ran fine for a year without stopping, and blazing fast too; if it also confused a few comment spam bots then all the merrier.

So I tried putting Apache into the mix so I could use a Location directive to direct /robots.txt to somewhere with the robots.txt file, but no joy, this would have required doing a lot of what I never got around to before.

So I then looked into how the test server was deploying the site, thinking that I could do some kind of smart regular expressions type matching like in Django or Pylons. But nope.

Hack for the win

So the next step down is PyBlosxom, so I looked out of chance in Pyblosxom/pyblosxom.py and saw the following:

def __call__(self, env, start_response):
    """
    Runs the WSGI app.
    """
    # ensure that PATH_INFO exists. a few plugins break if this is
    # missing.
    if "PATH_INFO" not in env:
        env["PATH_INFO"] = ""

    p = PyBlosxom(self.config, env)
    p.run()

    pyresponse = p.getResponse()
    start_response(pyresponse.status, list(pyresponse.headers.items()))
    pyresponse.seek(0)
    return [pyresponse.read()]

Bingo! As soon as I saw it, I just somehow, on auto pilot, typed in the following lines before the line p = PyBlosxom(self.config, env):

if env["PATH_INFO"] == "/robots.txt":
    start_response('200 OK', [('Content-type','text/plain')])
    return ["""User-agent: * \nDisallow: /"""]

And unbelievably it worked. What I had subconsciously done was to see that we have some kind of string referred to by env["PATH_INFO"]. Then further on we have an object called start_response which is being passed a status and some headers. Then we are returning the response.

I was kidding around more than anything so I just replaced everything I didn't know about with reasonable looking constants (you will know these well if you have ever done Python CGI programming).

I am sure there are millions of far better ways to serve robots.txt with PyBlosxom. But this hack works for me until I no longer need the old site anymore.

May 12, 2008 10:54 PM :: West Midlands, England  

George Kargiotakis

jailkit-2.3 ebuild patch fix for sunrise overlay

There’s an ebuild for jailkit version 2.3 on sunrise overlay. Unfortunately it has a bug that can cause severe headaches. It patches your /etc/shells in a VERY wrong way so that you can easily end up _only_ with /usr/sbin/jk_chrootsh inside /etc/shells. This can lock you out of your machine! This behaviour is due to a [...]

May 12, 2008 05:05 PM :: Greece  

Zeth

Give Linux a chance

Mughlai and Jalfrezi are better than gruel

A few hundred years ago, the great mass of the British poor ate gruel, while the middle class ate bland over-boiled vegetables. However, as a naval people, the British went out around the world with their empire, and brought food and foreign chefs back with them. Now British people can and do eat food originating from the whole world. Not just the rich, normal working class people will regularly eat curry, Cantonese food, kebabs and so on that would not have been imaginable before.

If I tried to explain this to a 14th Century peasant eating his gruel, then he probably would just ignore me, having no idea what I am talking about. At best he might look at me strangely, and then go back to his life of gruel.

Windows is the gruel of the digital world. There are certain people that understand this fact and have moved on to greater and better things, however most people take what they are given and swallow it as best they can.

What is an operating system?

If you don't know what a computer program is, think about cooking. In cooking you have tools, such as an oven and a blender and you have ingredients such as vegetables and meat. The recipe allows you to use the tools to take your food (ingredients) and turn them into to other types of food (meals).

In computers, you have tools (called hardware) such as a DVD player, a screen, a keyboard, a hard drive and so on. The computer program is the mathematical recipe that allows you to take your data (text, pictures, videos, etc) and then do various things with it. So for example, you might use a computer program that takes a song from the hard-drive and then plays it out of the speakers.

An operating system is a set of computer programs that makes your computer hardware do the basic things (put text on the screen, play sound, and so on). You might then run other programs to do more advanced things. It is like your recipe book.

People who are in to cooking will try out lots of recipe books, and in doing so, they do not starve because they have bought a different recipe book, indeed the opposite happens, they cook so much that they do not have time to eat it all themselves so have to give food to their family and neighbours.

By changing recipe book, they don't suddenly become unable to cook, they in fact get better as they move on to better and more advanced recipe books.

If you turn on you computer and see Windows, then Windows is your current 'operating system'. If you have only ever used Windows, don't you think it is time to give up the gruel and try a new recipe book?

I think so, and if you think this way then you have come to the right place!

About Windows

Windows started on home computers and was commonly used for playing computer games. Though some shifty business deals in the 1980s and 1990s, Windows became pre-installed on the PC and so became the main operating system used by non-technical users.

However, there a lot of people that think that this situation is not good for humanity and we need to progress past it.

Why? Well lets look at some of the reasons.

Firstly, Windows does not promote a competitive industry. Only Microsoft can sell Windows, only Microsoft can really provide complete support for Windows. Mainstream PC shops may only stock Windows PCs.

So you have one company earning billions of their monopoly, with these excess profits, Microsoft can then give campaign contributions to politicians to make sure they don't make the industry competitive or hold Microsoft to account when they break the law.

Weak, bribed, politicians allow Microsoft to use the educational system as a giant marketing tool, indoctrinating a new generation to become helpless and passive recipients of Microsoft's, and only Microsoft's, products.

Secondly, each version of Windows is developed in secret, and then launched with billions of dollars worth of marketing to make you believe the magic; however like all magic, it is no replacement for public peer review. Microsoft don't like public peer review because they know that when compared fairly to other operating systems, Windows always loses.

The fact that there is no public peer review, and no effective competitive pressures, means that Windows is not very well engineered. When the main architecture of DOS and Windows was created in the 80s, it was already 20 years behind the state of computer science; and it has not really changed that much since.

This 'closed-off from the world in my own cave' approach to software engineering means that Windows is plagued with security problems, it uses computer resources inefficiently, wasting electricity and requiring unnecessary replacement of perfectly fine computers that could have lasted another five to ten years.

Fourthly, a software mono-culture, like a biological monoculture, is not very healthy. If a future Windows virus wipes out all of the world's Windows PCs, then 90% of the computer using population are offline, without their data and without access to government services, Internet commerce and digital information. Businesses would collapse and the western world would be plunged into a digital dark age.

Fourthly, because what Windows is doing is a secret; if you use Windows, then you are not in control of your computer, Microsoft is. Windows reports back lots of data to the USA which is then made available to whomever Microsoft wants to share it with. While most of us are not interesting to the US security agencies; Microsoft can sell your private information to anyone.

In short, Windows leaves your backdoor open to Microsoft, but even if you trust Microsoft, the US government, and all companies that Microsoft might sell your information too; the fact there are built-in backdoors means that anyone, criminals, terrorists, anyone, can potentially walk through Microsoft's backdoor to access your private data or install viruses or tracking software on your PC.

There is another way...

...Indeed there are lots of them! The opposite to Windows slavery is software freedom. And with freedom comes lots of choices, and choices are good! If you have spent a lifetime eating gruel then you might resent choice, but then remember the intolerant character in Dr Seuss' classic "Green Eggs and Ham", who resists and resists trying out new things for unjustified reasons.

The operating system I currently use is GNU/Linux (commonly just called Linux), which started out in Universities and parts were contributed by thousands of volunteers over the world wide web; others soon joined in, such as small and large companies, charities and even the American military.

Unlike Windows, any company or individual can share, sell, give away or provide services for GNU/Linux, anyone can change it, and there is complete public peer review. There are no hidden traps and you are in control of your own computer.

Also the way Linux executes programs is based on a completely different architecture. There is no concept of an untrusted, unknown program having access to everything. The problems that plague Windows, viruses, spywhere, malware and worms, do not exist in the Linux world. They have never existed and will never exist, because the architecture of the system is not designed that way.

So as I said before, anyone can give out Linux, so lots of people do (remember: choice is good) most versions are free and you can legally share them with your friends and neighbours without having to ask anyone.

Give it a go!

May 12, 2008 11:00 AM :: West Midlands, England  

Jan Tönjes

Platten Putt - NSLU2 + extern HDD?!!

Vor ungefaehr 2 Wochen war auf einmal eine Festplatte mit 80GB nicht mehr ansprechbar. Ich konnte das Problem mit dem Austausch des IDE-Kabels beheben. Die Platte war kurze Zeit spaeter wieder nicht ansprechbar und liess sich auch nicht mehr zum ansprechen ueberreden. Jetzt ist mir auch noch eine zweite 80er Platte kaputt gegangen. Jaja, ich weiss, sie waren alt, und auch die letzten 5 Jahre im Dauereinsatz…

Dennoch ist es aergerlich fuer mich auf einen Schlag zwei Platten zu verlieren, die ich u.a. dafuer genutzt habe meine Backups drauf zu schieben.

Ich moechte eigentlich ungern wieder feste Platten in einen Rechner verbauen. Externe finde ich da irgendwie praktischer. Schon lange liebaeugel ich mehr oder weniger mit einem Linksys NSLU2 und bei den aktuellen Plattenpreisen… Ich stell mir das gerade vor mit z.B. zwei 500GB Platten von WD (zum Beispiel diese hier). Ich finde das Nett! Das sind mal schnell zusammengefasst 1TB Speicher verfuegbar im Netzwerk incl. eines sehr netten Geek-Toys fuer ~225€…

Bevor ich mir jedoch ernsthaft Gedanken ueber eine evtl. Finanzierung mache, moechte ich wissen, ob das Ding auch von der Hardwareleistung her vernuenftig Streamen kann. Interessant ist es ja fuer mich z.B. im Zusammenspiel mit meinem XBMC. Laut Aussagen in Foren (z.B. da) geht das… Noch weitere Stimmen?

May 12, 2008 07:31 AM :: Lower Saxony, Germany  

May 10, 2008

Brian Carper

Vim color scheme: Gentooish

I look at Vim 7 or 8 hours a day, so it's nice if the colors don't give me a headache. I've used ps_color for years but recently I decided it's a bit too washed-out and it has some quirks that make it hard to read Ruby code. It's hard to find anything else that's any better though. inkpot is good but it's a bit too monochrome for me. I like things to have a very distinct hue rather than rely on saturation or subtle differences.

So I started writing my own color scheme. For some reason that's beyond me, I seem to gravitate toward purple and green. Green is my favorite color, but why purple? I think it might be due to Gentoo brainwashing, so I called this color scheme Gentooish. I've been using it for a week or so and I keep changing things that annoy me, which will probably continue, but it's non-sucky enough to upload at this point probably.

Download gentooish.vim.
Gentooish

I've never written a color scheme before, but it's not difficult. inkpot had nice clean source code so I used that as a basis. ps_color's source is horrific.

Sadly I'm not 100% sure how vim color schemes map to colors in a terminal. Konsole, urxvt, xterm, and a real terminal all show me different colors when using the same color scheme. So I didn't bother with it.

May 10, 2008 07:49 PM :: Pennsylvania, USA  

Christoph Bauer

Betrachtungen über das Wetter…

…und die auswirkungen der bodennahen sonnenstrahlen auf die psyche der zentraleuropäischen hochgebirgsbewohnenden landbevölkerung

klingt ja schon mal interessant…

könnte auch interessant werden, sofern man es wagt, sich bei den aktuell herrschenden wetterbedingungen dem kontakt mit der angeführten bewohnerschaft des mittleren und unteren rheintales sowie der bevölkerung des vorderen bregenzerwaldes auszusetzen…

nun, ich tat es und ich tu es nach wie vor. warum? versuch dir mal einen biker im wohnzimmer vorzustellen! geht nicht? nein? na dann wirst ihn wohl auf der strasse antreffen…

so, und jetzt nach diesem kurzen exkurs ins reich der phantasie zurück zum thema: das wetter, die damit verbundenen physikalischen realitäten und der mensch des unteren, mittleren und des oberen rheintales sowie des vorderen bregenzerwaldes. ach ja, und die touristen, eigentlich, so wie sie sich verhalten, besser als terroristen bezeichnet, die darf man auch nicht vergessen!

nun, was zeigt uns das alltägliche leben? mit steigender temperatur steigt der rocksaum der jungen zentraleuropäerinnen. ob das nun positiv oder negativ zu werten ist, sei voerst einmal aus der betrachtung ausgeklammert. eine folge des rocksaumanstiegs ist auf jeden fall der anstieg des hormonspiegels der dazugehörigen, jungen und vorzugsweise männlichen hochgebirgslandjäger. daraus folgt naturgegebener maßen ein drastischer abfall der hemmschwelle, einhergehend mit einem ebenso drastischen schwund der zurechnungsfähigkeit. das ist relativ leicht am dauernd geöffneten mund eines jungen, vorzugsweise männlichen gebirgseuropäers.

klingt nun, als wären davon nur junge alpenhirschen betroffen, aber nein, bei abhandengekommenseins der angetrauten senn- und alpbewohnenden weiblichen bevölkerung tritt dieses phänomän der offenen klapparatur auch bei alpendjangos der gehobeneren altersklasse ebenfalls auf. das geht soweit, bis der offene mund und der gekrümmte rücken mit hilfe von sogenannten oder auch heilbehelfen gestützt werden muß. dann erst kann dieses phänomän nicht mehr beobachtet werden. scheint, als ob das sture auf-überbreite-gürtel-glotzen in direktem zusammenhang mit dem sinn- und unsinnlosen öffnen der klapparatur steht.

zurück zur höhe des rocksaums und der positiven oder negativen bewertung: auch hier konnten schon diverse beobachtugnen gemacht werden, die zwar unlogisch, aber in der natur immer häufiger vorkommen und demzufolge schon die wandlung von der these zur theorie vollzogen haben.

die höhe des rocksaums ist quadratisch proportional zum durchmesser der beine, die darunter hervor hängen. das bedeutet, de größer der durchmesser der beine ist, desto höher, und das sogar quadratisch!, ist der rocksaum angeordnet.

was heißt das nun? also, schlanke beine werden sehr häufig durch jeans oder knöchellange beinkleider anderer macharten versteckt und damit regen die beinträgerinnen die phantasie der männlichen alpenhirschen an, während bei kurzen, sehr groß bemessenen durchmesserstarken beinen grundsätzlich möglichst nahe an den scharnieren der rocksaum zu finden ist. eine drehbewegung der männlichen alpendjango-köpfe ist sehr oft die folge. allerdings nicht hin zu diesen beinen, sondern weg! man könnte dies auch mit fluchtinstinkten umschreiben.

welche der beiden varianten nun als positiv und welche als negativ bezeichnet werden kann, ist nun schwer zu definieren. die weiblichen alpendjangos und terroristinnen haben da sehr häufig gegenteilige ansichten als die männlichen exemplare.

wie sieht das nun mit einem erkennbaren defizit an gehirnbetätigung aus? und woran erkennt man so ein defizit an einem freilaufenden alpeneuropäer oder terroristen?

nun, das ist recht einfach: sogenannte importeuropäer, erkennbar an gelackter kopfbehaarung in dunklerer ausführung, drehen allen beinen den kopf nach. egal, wie sie aussehen und wo der rocksaum zu finden ist, hauptsache, es handelt sich um eine beinträgerin! nach erfolgter eroberung wird diese dann mittels kopftuch und bettwäsche vor der umwelt geschützt. oder die umwelt wird vor ihr geschützt, diesbezüglich gibt es keine gezielten beobachtungsergebnisse. anders ist es bei den ursptrünglichen alpeneuropäern: diese beginnen bei anblick eines massiv-gebirgstauglichen zentnerbeines mit den augenbrauen zu zucken und noch undeutlicher zu lallen als unter dem gewöhnlichen alkoholeinfluß. und schlußendlich die erkennbarkeit bei terroristen, die ist sehr einfach: zusammenkommen von sauerstoffmangel und frei sichtbaren beinen jeglicher form und jeglichen formates lösen plötzliches fallenlassen von müll jeder art und gleichzeitigem zücken eines fotoapparates an allen möglichen und unmöglichen lokalitäten aus. blitz und bruzzel und feddisch issa, der olle touri…

gibt es sonst noch auffälligkeiten zur herrschenden großwetterlage, dem drohenden stauwochenende und den europäern? klar! europäer werden in blechdosen hingekarrt, wohin auch immer asphaltbänder führen, vorzugsweise zu straßenräubern des 21. jahrhunderts, den italienern. auf dem weg in deren reich werden, soweit es nur irgendwie machbar ist, alle kreuzungen verstopft, klaustrophobieanfälle und kreislaufkollapse en masse und dazu weißwürste und weißbier, was auch immer das sein soll. und ist dieses nicht verfügbar, ein hefeweizen tut’s auch… und die angestammte alpenbewohnerschaft dreht am rad…

und ist der spuk vorbei, bleiben einige kfz-mechaniker auf ihren rechnungen und die landbevölkerung auf zigarettenstummeln sitzen… und die filmrollen in den mittelalterlichen radargeräten müssen ausgewechselt und schöner erinnerungsfotos ausgearbeitet werden.

fazit: touristen, oder auch terroristen, sind mindestens so bradngefährlich wie elefanten in miniröcken… und alles dreht sich im kreise…


Copyright © 2007
Please note that this feed is for private use only. All other usage, including the distribution or reproduction of multiple copies, performance or otherwise use in a public way of the images or text require the authorization of the author.
(digitalfingerprint: 0f46ca51d0fa4e6588e24f0bf2b80fed)

May 10, 2008 12:04 PM :: Vorarlberg, Austria  

Dan Ballard

Mindstab Go AI competition really starting now

Ok, so I know we announced it at around Christmas, but *now* the Mindstab AI Go Competition is starting to get under way. Both Rob and I now have entries that can compete, though mine is mostly just an over engineered random bot, until I get even more framework in place.
Still, everything has really started happening this week as now that school is over, I've had some time to devote to this, so my bot finally got off the ground. And then we got together to day and hacked on the server some more cleaning it up, and making an 0.2 release of out Go client/server software.
Finally, and most fun, we whipped together a Matchs page where you can see all the results of games so far. See, real proof that things are happening!
So with this out of the way I can really start to focus on the bot. To that end I've defiantly come up against some quicks in Lisp and SBCL. But then today we were also working in C, Python and PHP and we certainly came up against some quirks in the first two (oddly PHP really does manage to get out of your way and let you do your thing). Still, I think I have things mostly worked out and I can focus on the bot. Which is fun because I'm finding for the most part I'm really enjoying coding in Lisp and Slime+Emacs is pretty rocking. As for the bot, I'm excited. I've got some fun plans for it and I haven't done nearly enough fun coding since school's been on.

May 10, 2008 10:10 AM :: British Columbia, Canada  

May 09, 2008

Dan Ballard

Note for C developers on Ubuntu

Right, so when doing C development on Ubuntu I suddenly noticed something was missing in the pan pages department. Like all the C api.

apt-get install manpages-dev

ah that's better. Someone might want to make it part of the 'build-essentials' package.

May 09, 2008 07:57 PM :: British Columbia, Canada  

Jürgen Geuter

Things that some people forget about Python dictionaries

Lists and listy things like tuples and dictionaries are the work horses of Python. You use them to store collections of data and usually when you look at some Python library that you use, they either rely on the built-in listy types, too, or at least implement the interface so the custom data structures work as they are supposed to.

Dictionaries are of course especially useful, they offer functionality that is called "associative array" in PHP and hash table in other languages.

Now you will probably have written code at some point that tried to get some key from a dictionary and in case if failed use a default value, that is a common use case (especially for example with the request.session instance in a Django context).

If you try to access a key in a dictionary that does not exist it raises a KeyError exception to notify you of that so you often see code like this:
try: data = dictionary['key'] except KeyError,e: data = "DEFAULT_VALUE"

This code works but is somewhat cumbersome to write, that must be easier, right? It is.

Every dictionary has a method get() that has two parameters: The first one is the key you want to access, the second one (which defaults to "None") gives the default value you want to get in return if the requested key does not exist.

>>> data={'key':'value'} >>> print(data.get('not_key','DEFAULT') DEFAULT

This makes the handling of those cases a lot more simple and elegant. But there is even another option, the collections module of the standard library.

In this module you find the class defaultdict which is a subclass of the default dictionary with a modified __init__ that accepts a new optional parameter default_factory. If default_factory is unset (therefore None) access to a non-existing key raises a KeyError as expected, but if default_factory is a callable the return of that is given in case the key does not exist.

A short example:
>>> import collections >>> defdic = collections.defaultdict(lambda: "DEFAULT") >>> # defdic is empty >>> defdic['test'] DEFAULT

Instead if that simple lambda function that just returns a fixed string you can of course give any other function that does logging to databases or whatever. Very flexible, very elegant and something that too many programmers ignore.

If you didn't know it before I hope this will allow you to write better Python in the future :-)

May 09, 2008 11:58 AM :: Germany  

Jason Jones

friends

Sometimes it doesnt seem like i have anyfriends at alll cause i always get ditched and ignored at school wen megan isnt there cause desie always seems to wanna hang wit the other ppl in our class then me cause she says me and megan are alot closer then me and her which is true but still.and i wish she could come stay wit me this weekend cause of my dad.im scared of my dad and megan is the only person who helps me out wen i have to face my dad cause i call her or have her come stay wit me and one time she stayed wit me and my dad went to slap me in my face megan went and took a lamp and bashed it over his head it was really funny but scary 2 cause we were scared after that and went and locked our selfs in my room and didnt come out for the rest of the nite and im lucky megan still comes and stays with me after that happened.she said shell always be there 4 me and she wasnt lien when she said that and she knows ill always be there 4 her and she knows that cause of what happened one time wen we where hanging out at the square after that day is wen we became really close but i cant say wat happened at the square megan can tell u if she wants even though it would be wrong cause its our businesse anyways i miss her cause i havent seen or talked 2 her in two days and its killing me here i wish she would have came today anyways i have 2 go math class is almost over and i got to get off the computer i shouldnt even be on this site cause im at school and ill get in trouble if i get caught anyways bye 4 now ppl

May 09, 2008 09:43 AM :: Utah, USA  

Sean Potter

School's Out

The Spring '08 semester has finally drawn to a close. I'm so glad I'll be able to go back to getting reasonable amounts of sleep, and not going to school for several hours a day, then working close to 40 hours a week as well. I'll be much happier being able to split my time between BIOSLEVEL.com and Buffalo Wild Wings.

For BIOSLEVEL, Sapphire recently sent us new AMD 780G chipset motherboard, Radeon HD3450, and an overclocked Radeon HD3870. Between the motherboard and Radeon HD3870, there's a pretty powerful machine just waiting to be powered. Several companies sent us additional parts for the review, which included 2GB of RAM, a quad-core Phenom CPU, and a slew of heatsinks. The reviews of the motherboard and videocard have been posted, and I've got several reviews lined up for the donated components as well. I'm just amazed at the piled of stuff that was shipped to us to power the motherboard.

Simply put, I'm surprised at how well the motherboard's ATI-based integrated graphics performed in Linux. This won't be a motherboard I let out of my sight anytime soon. Since my last final on Wednesday, I've completed an entire two reviews in a single 24-hour period. It's so ridiculously nice to have time away from school again.

Maybe this'll finally be that summer I do something truly productive (and profitable). I've got all the ideas lined up, but do I have the time or motivation to do it? Time will tell.

May 09, 2008 07:05 AM

Brian Carper

Passwords in log files = bad

In Linux when I use SSH I usually pass the host and port and username on the command line and then type the password when prompted. (In those rare cases I don't use certificates to log in without a password.) In Windows, PuTTY makes you pick a host and port and then prompts you for the username AND password.

This leads to unpleasant results. I'm so conditioned to open SSH and type my password at the prompt and hit Enter that I often end up typing my password as my username in PuTTY. Bad.

I've sometimes opened webpages that have some stupid Javascript bullcrap that tries to auto-focus the username field in a login form. But if you're a fast typist (and mouse-ist) like I am, you can focus the field, type your username, and hit tab to get to the password field before the long-loading Javascript bloat has a time to load and run. Which can result in auto-re-focusing the username field, which if it happens at just the right instant, results in my typing the password into it and pounding Enter before I have a chance to notice what's happened. Bad bad bad.

I use a computer far too often to have time too read every prompt, which leads to bad things. Anyone who's used to flying around an interface at light-speed by instinct and repeated learned behavior has experienced this kind of thing I'm sure.

This is horrendously bad because these programs often log the usernames of login attempts in plaintext in logs that lots of potentially evil people have the ability to read. The logs don't usually log the passwords of login attempts, but if you type a password AS a username, oops, you're screwed. Thankfully I'm root on most or all of the machines I ever SSH to, and I can go into /var/log and erase my mistake from the logs before anyone can see. But that doesn't help for web pages I don't know. And I wonder how often this kind of thing happens to other people. I wonder how many people who aren't familiar with computers accidentally send their password as their username to a bunch of websites.

After all the effort we go to to try to secure computer applications, these kinds of stupid human factors can still so easily ruin everything.

May 09, 2008 03:31 AM :: Pennsylvania, USA  

May 08, 2008

Liu Qing

after emerge -C mktemp

<bigmonk> I emerge -C mktemp, and emerge world -uND then my wife
poweroff my computer.
<reisio> bigmonk: nice :)
<altaran> bigmonk, u need help with death body?
<altaran> :)
<chithead> bigmonk: boot from livecd, chroot into your install and
emerge coreutils
<mki> bigmonk, boot with init=/bin/bash, mount -o remount,rw / && ln
-s busybox /bin/mktemp, reboot
<bigmonk> thank u , let me try
<bigmonk> mki, ur method is so easy, I have succeed. thank u.
<mki> bigmonk, np.. busybox ftw!
<bigmonk> chithead, thank u . mki's method is better.

May 08, 2008 09:13 PM :: Beijing, China  

Thomas Keller

Antec Sonata III

Today, I finally got my new Antec Sonata III case for my Gentoo server. I had to move a little bit, because I needed space for my Brother MFC device; the old case was just too big… The Sonata III is a nice case, but still a little bit loud - I had to switch power [...]

May 08, 2008 04:56 PM

Jürgen Geuter

Ubuntu Hardy

Since Ars Technica has released their really great and in-depth review of Ubuntu 8.04 (Hardy), I guess I can add a few thoughts, too.

I have been using Hardy on my Thinkpad for a while now (when I got it I didn't have the time to install Gentoo cause I needed it up running fast) so I thought I'd share a few things.

The Good



A few good things about the new release.

Firefox 3 Beta



There have been a few complaints about including a beta package as the default browser but I think it was the right decision: It's stable and a lot faster than its predecessor. Some extensions might not be ported yet, but the situation has gotten better. The Speed improvements and the new location bar alone are worth it. Good decision there

Wubi



The Wubi utility that allows installing Linux into Windows is a great way for people to try Linux out without being as limited as you are when you're using a live CD.

The Bad



There are bad things about it, too.

Bootsplash



I'm not a huge fan of bootsplashes, they hide information that you really might want to see (as errors of daemons starting up) and especially on Laptops I think it's absolutely crucial to crypt your /home partition so I need to enter the passphrase upon bootup (something that I can't do while the bootsplash is there). I think it should be a setting that the installer asks you (as well as automatic drive encryption for /home).

Drive encryption



As I said in the paragraph before, the installer should encourage drive encryption for the /home partition and offer a simple way to do it as well as install the necessary packages by default.

The Ugly



There's one thing where Ubuntu dropped the ball in my opinion that pretty much makes this one of their worst releases yet for beginners.

Pulseaudio



The inclusion of pulseaudio sounded like the right thing to do when it was announced. Pulseaudio is a software sound mixer that allows very advanced sound routing (you can for example move a playing audiostream to another soundcard without the sound stopping) and it has legacy support for pretty much any other system under the sun (as detailed here) but it seems that all the Ubuntu people did was include the pulseaudio server in the default distribution.

All the supporting tools that give the user access to the advanced features (like per application volume management) are not installed by default. Plugins that integrate pulseaudio with ALSA or the nonfree flash are not installed. The setup is pretty bad overall and there are many reports of people not being able to properly watch media because of the borked pulseaudio installation.

This mistake for a long term support release is really a bad sign for the distro that they'll need to fix in a bugfix release badly.

Summary



Hardy works. Kinda. It installs easy and has a few nice things but all in all it's got many problems due to bad package decisions and only half-implemented ideas (like pulseaudio). I had expected more from the Ubuntu team, especially for their long term support release, but maybe this is a good time for other distributions to finally get some extra spot light. One person's fuckup can be another person's chance ;-)

All in all it's not really a noteable release from my point of view, if your gutsy system runs and you're not all that interested in the newer packages (well not really "new" but "less ancient") you might want to skip this one.

May 08, 2008 11:52 AM :: Germany  

Daniel de Oliveira

Fail


Fail

Source: http://flickr.com/photos/paintitblack/2439080330/

May 08, 2008 03:02 AM :: São Paulo, Brazil  

Clete Blackwell

Schedule Changes for Fall 2008

A few days ago, I spoke with John Phillips (he is a computer science professor and adviser here at Mansfield) and I found out that I had made three class-selection errors in my Fall 2008 schedule. Luckily, he was able to set me on the right track. My new schedule is linked below. Instead of Accounting II (sorry to Dave and Vinnie), Data Structures (sorry to Dan McKee), and Honors Research (sorry Sara, Andrew, and others), I will be taking Computer Organization, Finite Math, and Principles of Microeconomics.

Revised Fall 2008 Schedule (PDF).

May 08, 2008 01:48 AM

May 07, 2008

Jürgen Geuter

Sure sign that your software review/comparison is retarded

Distributed VCSs like git are all the rage right now (and for a good reason cause they are superior to their ancestors like Subversion in more ways that I can say here), so we get many reviews and comparisons. Which one is better, which one is faster, which one is easier, which one is smarter?

All those are valid questions and it's awesome how many people invest their own time to help others decide on a DVCS (Oh by the way, I wanna help you, too: Use Git) but there is always one concern. How mature is the software?

We're not talking about whether the software is bare of any easter eggs or whether the error messages are unfunny, it's about whether the software is stable and does not corrupt your data. A VCS's main task is to keep your data and all its versions intact so maturity is obviously a huge concern.

Let's come to the topic of this: Is there an easy way to see if a review is good? Well that is not an easy question. Really deciding whether a comparison/review is good is probably only possible when you already know a lot about all compared systems. But there are some hints to see whether a comparison is bad, things that are easy to spot.

The best one and the one I want to point out here is when maturity is measured by the fact whether the version number of the software is greater than 1. When a review states that softwareA-0.9.4 is less mature than softwareB-1.0.1 you instantly know that the whole thing is obviously bogus.

Version numbers are completely random and have no meaning whatsoever. If they had, KDE 4.0.X would be more mature that KDE 3.5.X which it obviously is not. scipy a very mature and advanced library of scientific algorithms for Python is at version 0.6 right now. Does that mean I shouldn't use it?

It's the simple things that often show that some review is bad, this is one of the most obvious points.

May 07, 2008 07:28 PM :: Germany  

Leif Biberg Kristensen

Ode to a dead project

I just visited Sourceforge with the intention of declaring my “Urdabrunn” project as dead. But instead, I decided to announce that the project has moved to my own domain, Solumslekt. The Exodus project is the natural heir and successor of Urdabrunn, and it seems natural to host it here.

The problem with the Urdabrunn project was that it was far too ambitious, like so many other dead projects on Sourceforge. It’s of course much easier to concoct grand plans than to do the actual work.

I did write some routines in Python for the Urdabrunn project, but the major work was the construction and migration of the database itself and the parts of the business logic that I wrote in plpgsql. That codebase has survived to the present day. When I decided to “go incremental” with my humble PHP reports, the interface took off in a totally different direction from what I had imagined at the time I wrote the “Into the Blue” article and submitted the Urdabrunn project to Sourceforge.

For my own part, I feel that Exodus gives me what I need from a genealogy software package. For my personal use, it’s stable to the extent that several months may pass between each time I do even small incremental changes to the codebase.

During the last week, however, I have been in a flurry of refactoring and adding translation strings. That’s because I finally have been engaged in a serious discussion about the project. There is a big difference between writing software for your own use, and having another person trying it out and asking intelligent questions.

May 07, 2008 12:58 PM :: Norway  

Roderick B. Greening

Kicking Windows to the Door

Ok, so you have made the leap to the world of Linux, but perhaps you still dual boot to run Adobe PhotoShop or some other program due to not knowing if there are equivalent (or near equivalent) programs available under Linux. What can you do?

Well, luckily, there are a variety of ways to kick the Windows habit.

1) Wine - Wine is a Windows compatibility layer, and it runs under Linux. It will allow you to run a variety of Windows programs under Linux. There is an application database you can search to see if your program will work with wine, and how to install it. If your program is not listed, you can still try and install it by running the install.exe (or setup program) with wine. Please submit your experience to the applications database so others may learn from your experience.

2) Linux App Finder - This site categorizes a list of common Windows programs and maps them to equivalent Linux programs. Depending on what features you require/use, the Linux alternative may provide a reasonable functional equivalent. However, for more complex Windows programs and the power user, you may need to experiment with one or more alternatives to get the right mix for you.

May 07, 2008 12:49 PM :: NL, Canada  

Christoph Bauer

Update: Finally it arrived!

After the big download, I kick-started the installer and I couldn’t believe my eyes: That service pack wants to have 1475 MB free space while installation - true, that number sounds scary, but it wasn’t better with the second service pack.

Since the machine boots again, I am looking through application changes - in other words, what does not work any more. But luckily it is only the ATI-Catalyst 8.2 having problems: screen rotation does not work any more. I have not spotted anything else acting strange by now…


Copyright © 2007
Please note that this feed is for private use only. All other usage, including the distribution or reproduction of multiple copies, performance or otherwise use in a public way of the images or text require the authorization of the author.
(digitalfingerprint: 0f46ca51d0fa4e6588e24f0bf2b80fed)

May 07, 2008 06:48 AM :: Vorarlberg, Austria  

Finally it arrived!

After one week delay, the third service pack for Microsoft Windows XP arrived. You won’t believe it: It’s even available via automatic update.

But what’s inside? First of all, it’s a huge file being 313 MB which means a rather big download and a longer installation. But what’s under the hood? Can’t tell by now. I’m just installing.


Copyright © 2007
Please note that this feed is for private use only. All other usage, including the distribution or reproduction of multiple copies, performance or otherwise use in a public way of the images or text require the authorization of the author.
(digitalfingerprint: 0f46ca51d0fa4e6588e24f0bf2b80fed)

May 07, 2008 06:15 AM :: Vorarlberg, Austria  

Brian S. Stephan

A Tour of the Worm

http://world.std.com/~franl/worm.html

A Slashdot article reminded me of one of my favorite technical articles on the Internet entitled “A Tour of the Worm", an in-depth historical and technical look at the Morris worm. The Morris worm, mistakenly unleashed in 1988, was one of the first significant worms to strike the Internet, and it caused enough damage that it arguably has done the most relative damage of any worm since then.

Check it out if you haven’t read it, or even if you have; it’s a fascinating look at the early days of the Internet. http://world.std.com/~franl/worm.html

May 07, 2008 04:07 AM :: Wisconsin, USA  

May 06, 2008

Jason Jones

07 Mustang GT Upgrade Round 2

Okay...

Those who have followed my journal / blog, know that I have a 2007 Mustang GT, which I recently upgraded with Flowmaster exhaust and a Magnaflow X-Pipe.

Well, I was expecting it tomorrow, so when my wife called me at work, right after lunch to give me the news, I was beside myself with excitement.

Delievered to our door was my new Steeda cold air intake along with the Steeda inlet elbow.  Also delivered was a SCT X3 power flash tuner for my car's computer.

Well, needless to say, I couldn't wait to get it installed, so I hopped in my car, and went back home.

about 2 hours later, I was driving back to work with a dumbfounded grin in my face.

People had told me that a tune with a cold-air intake upgrade would seriously change / improve the sound of the car, but I was way more interested in the power upgrade.  Well, I now can totally understand why people emphasize the change in sound just as much, if not more, than the increase in power.

I cannot believe the way my mustang sounds now!

It's like the whole car has been in a groggy state of being half-awake since birth, and this upgrade has basically woke it up and given it a shot of caffeine!

The sound .... well...  The best I could do to explain it to you is to record it and attach it to this entry.  So, you can click the play button top-right to hear for yourself.

The first thing I noticed was the decrease in time for the car to rev up.  It now revs much quicker than before.

There also is a noticeable *pop* along with a sucking sound when accellerating quickly.  I just love it.

I've only driven it to work so far, so, I haven't really opened it up yet, but that is sure to come.

So, if you're thinking of upgrading to a cold-air intake, or considering tuning your car's computer, with what I know so far, I highly recommend it.

I'm sure I won't be changing my opinion when I can get a few minutes to actually drive it, either.

Goooood stuff!

May 06, 2008 05:20 PM :: Utah, USA  

Jürgen Geuter

Renaming files based on EXIF data

As I mentioned before, my girlfriend and me attended some family thingy this weekend. She took a bunch of photos but when transferring the files to her computer something weird happened.

Like many cameras (if not all) hers numbers the files ascending. When reading the files from the camera you can give a prefix that all files get (it was "Taufe" in this case) which is suffixed by the number (001, 002 ...). The problem was: The files were not in order.

That is not a biggie if you use some sort of photo management tool but she was planning to send them away burned to a CD so she wanted the files to be in proper order when looking at the with a default file manager, so here's how to do that.

The first thing you need is the exif utility which should be in your package manager. Now it's pretty easy actually:

#!/bin/bash for file in *.jpg ; do mv "$file" "`exif -t 0x0132 -m "$file"| sed -e's/:/-/ig' -e's/^/Taufe /ig' - e's/$/.jpg/ig'`" ; done
Some explanations:

exif -t 0x0132 makes sure that I only read the "tag" 0x0132 which in this case is the date. You can use the exif command to get a list of all tags a file support by calling it like this: exif -l filename. The -m switch makes the output "machine readable" by cutting away all the crap you don't need.

The date that came out was in the form YYYY:mm:dd HH:MM:SS which is (because of the ":") unsuitable as a file name (Windows users need to be able to use the files) so I used sed to do a few translations:
s/:/-/ig replaces all ":" with "-", s/^/Taufe /ig' replaces the beginning of the string with "Taufe " (as in prefixing) and s/$/.jpg/ig' replaces the end of the string with ".jpg" (as in suffixing). So we have transformed the EXIF date to the new file name and we can just call mv to rename the files.

This shows us once again that expensive utilities are not necessary and the built-in unix tools (except for the exif dependency) are absolutely sufficient. So next time you wanna do some renaming based on metadata you know how to do it ;-)

Have fun.

May 06, 2008 12:01 PM :: Germany  

Martin Matusiak

why you’ll never have security with Microsoft

Here’s the thing. I hate stating the obvious. It really annoys me. On the other hand, obvious things are sometimes things that most need to be repeated. So I wrestle with myself and I finally decide that I should, because there is a shockingly large number of people out there who don’t realize how obvious this is. See if you can learn something from this mock dialog.

Vendor: Good morning, is this Harry, the CTO*, I’m speaking to?
Client: Yes, how may I help you?
Vendor: Hey Harry, this is Steve from Microsoft. I would like to talk to you about Windows Vista.
Client: What’s that?
Vendor: Why, it’s the brand new version of our Windows operating system.
Client: Oh, that.
Vendor: I was wondering if I could interest you in our product.
Client: You know what, I don’t think so, we are a very security sensitive company, and..
Vendor: But that’s precisely the reason I’m calling, I would like to tell you how you can enhance your security with Windows Vista. You see, we’ve built the operating system with security in mind and it’s the state of the art in operating systems.
Client: Hey, that sounds pretty exciting. So how does this work now, you ship us the source code and…
Vendor: No no, we don’t distribute the source code.
Client: You don’t?!?
Vendor: No, you see it’s a trade secret. (my precious etc)
Client: You’re kidding, right?
Vendor: No, really.
Client: So how do we know that it’s actually secure if we can’t see for ourselves? How do we know there isn’t anything malicious in it?
Vendor: Well you’ll just have to trust us.
*Harry hangs up*
Vendor: Hello? Harry?
*CTO - the highest placed person who makes technical decisions in a company.

How did it go? Did you get it? It was kind of a long thing, huh? Ok, stop racking your brains, I’ll give you the answer: no source code, no security.

Here’s how that works. It’s simple economics, so try to keep up. If they give you the source code, then they put their cards on the table. You can see what the code does, and if it’s doing something stupid (security hole) or nasty (like sending your data to back to the vendor), then you’ll be able to check for this. Now you may say “I don’t know how to check”, and that’s okay. But just by giving you the source code the vendor knows that you can see everything the code is doing. And if you find something nasty in there, they know you’ll never trust them again. So it doesn’t really matter if *you* don’t know how to check, because there are others who do, and sooner or later someone will find the nasty code if it’s in there. Thus, if the vendor gives you the source code, then he’ll be a lot more careful about what’s in there, because he’s risking losing your trust and your business forever. That will keep him honest.

Is there then anything surprising about finding out that Microsoft is putting in backdoors in Windows? No, because how would you know it’s there? You don’t have the source code! In case you were wondering, the words “security” and “backdoor” are mutually exclusive.

So what have we learned today? Is there somehow we could summarize all this in just one sentence? There is: If you want security, ask for the source code. If you can’t get the source code, you know that the vendor isn’t taking security seriously.

May 06, 2008 11:41 AM :: Utrecht, Netherlands  

Jürgen Geuter

Package distribution

Ruby has a distribution problem is a nice article dealing with Ruby's problems with package distribution. The problem basically is that the different ways of supplying Ruby libraries are not compatible so you cannot just say "you need ModuleX installed" but you would have to say "you have to have ModuleX installed via InstallerY".

The problem is mostly triggered by the fact that Ruby nowadays is mostly Rails. But Rails applications are usually written for one client, for one specific installation, not for widespread personal use. This means that the developer usually controls or at least knows the environment completely which makes installing required packages properly easy. It becomes a nasty problem when distribution your software on a large scale (think of wordpress scale).

The usual Ruby workaround is to bundle everything. And that approach is not just present for Ruby: Java program often come with pretty much every Java package under the sun included (mostly cause they only work with one specific version of the package used), and even I have recently packaged a whole GTK installation with some software for a client because without it the Windows version had problems over problems.

Packaging things with your application can be right: When I did it, I packaged all kinds of stuff because I knew that the target system would not have Python or anything else installed so bundling stuff would be the way to go. But Most of the time bundling libraries with your software is just a bad idea.

If you use a modern operating system with decent package management the libraries you bundle will not be updated by the normal process. Which means that security flaws or functional bugs will not be automatically corrected, making your customers/users target for all kinds of attack vectors (the binary JDK used to bundle all kinds of libs with many, many known vulnerabilities for example). In this context bundling is bad. As in really bad. On the other hand that point of view is too simplistic.

A big bunch of the operating systems used today don't have sane package management (most importantly MS Windows and Apple's OSX) so your users don't have the advantages of that anyways. Also for those platforms it's usually a big pain in the ass to install libraries and packages you need. You have to visit buttloads of websites, download and install packages just to see that your still need to get another package to fulfill all requirements. In those cases bundling working libraries might make sense.

Many languages don't offer really good ways to install extensions/modules/packages/however you wanna call them. Perl has it's famous CPAN which is pretty much the best example we have considering ease of use, functionality and quality. Python's Cheeseshop is quite good and easy but not up to Perl. Ruby, Java and other mainstream languages really have not a lot to compete in this area.

It's somewhat of a hen-and-egg problem: Since there's not decent way to manage extension modules everybody bundles stuff and since everybody bundles stuff no one creates a decent extension installing mechanism.

We're talking about a language's culture here, about a mindset. Right now both mindsets work: The install mechanism and the bundling but from a logical standpoint the bundling really should be the rare exception.

Bundling libraries or packages creates a whole new can of worms for you: You'll not only have to manage your own software but also other packages from other vendors, you have to keep track of their bugs, issues and might even have to manually patch them. Then you have to get your users to pull your updated version. All in all it's a huge pain in the ass for developers and (on systems with no sane package management) for the users that have to get used to 30 different ways to update software.

Bundling won't die easily but developer's mindset can be changed more easily. Stop thinking that packaging of your software is unimportant. Stop relying on things to work or the admin to figure the issues out. Exactly knowing your dependencies is not just important for your documentation but also for your own development. Find dependency management for your platform/language and use it so you encounter the same problems your users might have. Don't bundle stuff until you really must, your software will work better and you will get less cryptic bug reports that you just cannot seem to debug.

May 06, 2008 10:15 AM :: Germany  

Portage 2.2 and FEATURES="stricter"

Portage 2.2 is still masked but I'm using it to test it and it's already working great but there seems to be a change that makes compiling many things a lot more difficult: FEATURES="stricter" seems to be the default now.

This will show when random packages won't install anymore because of install_qa_check problems with certain ... not so helpful error messages like
  * ERROR: net-fs/nfs-utils-1.1.2-r1 failed.
 * Call stack:
 *       misc-functions.sh, line 652:  Called install_qa_check
 *       misc-functions.sh, line 360:  Called die
 * The specific snippet of code:
 *   		[[ ${abort} == "yes" ]] && hasq stricter ${FEATURES} && die "poor code kills airplanes"
 *  The die message:
 *   poor code kills airplanes


Until the packages are fixed (and there's quite a bunch of them) you can unset that new behavior by adding "-stricter" to your FEATURES in /etc/make.conf.

Just a little headsup in case you forgot you unmasked portage and have problems installing stuff.

May 06, 2008 09:50 AM :: Germany  

If you're scared of that you probably shouldn't tinker with it anyways

I stumbled on an article today called "Ubuntu Nuggets - it’s the little things that count" that rubbed me in the wrong way.

The article gave a list of a few GUI applications that the author felt made life in Ubuntu (and probably other linux distributions) easier for people and in general I have no problem with that kind of list: From time to time they even show me a nifty little application that I had not known about before which is always neat. And even if not those articles might help others so it's all good. Well not all.

Let's look at a few of the items the author presents: Under the heading "Simplifying GRUB" he gives a selection of two graphical editors for grub.conf/menu.lst (the file that tells your bootloader which kernels to load).

The grub.conf file is not really complex, it's actually really really straight forward and simple. If you are scared to touch that very simple file to get some change done you want (as in changing the default kernel which is just editing the lines # By default, boot the first entry. default 0) you probably will do even more damage with a graphical tool to mess around.

People feel very comfortable with graphical tools and checkboxes and dropdown menus, so they start fiddling around in it like they are used to with their usual applications. The problem is that they are in a place where little changes can really mess the system up and since they were to scared to edit a little number in a text file they probably don't really know what they are doing.

I can't count the times I had to rescue some Windows installation after the owner had found "Power tools" or however all those applications are called that allow you to set all kinds of internal Windows settings. Those settings often do not have a GUI because the developer didn't want you to click that checkbox and make your system unbootable. Whowouddathunk?

This is not saying that the linked article does not offer anything useful, for example the "Ink Management" part or the "Virtualization made easier" part might really help a few people. But if you're too scared to edit grub.conf or the fstab you probably should mess with them via GUI. Only click when you know what you're doing there.

Just think of thins: You're too scared to touch those files by hand but use a GUI. You don't know what it does but it changes the files somehow. It might work for a while but then you encounter problems. You post your file to the forums of your distro and the other users have to deal with the carnage that the GUI tool might have left (because even in simple files like fstab every distro seems to have their own "style" of doing things).

Better read a short howto and just do it in a text editor, especially when it comes to your boot configuration. I personally wouldn't set all those gnome gconf settings via the commandline either, but some files are better just worked on directly. Oh and while we're at it:

When you are unsure of whether your changes are right, copy the original line, comment out the old one, and modify the copy. Now add a comment above the edited line to remind you what you were trying to do and maybe even add the link to the howto you used. Will make your life (and the lives of the people that will try to help you in case things go wrong) a lot easier.

May 06, 2008 09:06 AM :: Germany  

May 05, 2008

Jürgen Geuter

Unholy

Unholy is a project that can compile ruby scripts to python bytecode and actually turn it into python source from the bytecode later.

It's a fun idea that would finally make ruby useful ;-)

Neat little project, of course not all that useful: Python's interpreter is a lot faster that ruby's but Sun is throwing so much money a JRuby and the likes that not using the Java VM with ruby sounds rather dumb. On the other hand having Java stuff always sucks so I can understand the creator ;-)

Well, it's basically one of those projects I love: Kinda pointless but still a lot of fun.

May 05, 2008 08:35 PM :: Germany  

Intellectual property is not oil

You might not know who Mark Getty is, but you probably have heard one of his more famous quotes:
"Intellectual Property is the oil of the 21st century"


Just to save you some time reading Wikipedia and getting distracted from this post (it would be interesting to see how many people leave a blog post they are reading to check a random Wikipedia link and never come back ;-) ), Mark Getty is a member of a rich family that made its money from oil, he owns Getty Images, a commercial archive of images of various kinds.

Considering that history, his comparison is not surprising and it feels kinda right: Everyone and their mom has heard how important intellectual property is and the way that certain sectors of the content industry fight for their monopolies or at least market does somewhat compare to the oil business. Let's have a look whether the comparison of intellectual property and oil is a suitable one.

Disclaimer: Just for the sake of the argument we assume here that a thing as "intellectual property" exists. Personally I think that that concept is flawed and does not really work but that would be another blog post (if interested, I might write that one later). So, to summarize: "Intellectual property" exists for the duration of this article. So back to the argument.

Mr Getty's quote obviously hints at the importance that "intellectual property" will gain in the next few years, an importance that he thinks is comparable to the importance of oil nowadays.

Oil fuels our western economies, it allows us to drive cars, to have cheap transportation, to create various plastic crap. Oil is everywhere and we feel how important it is every day since the price of oil is raising every day. The importance of oil is only surpassed by its scarcity: There's only so much oil on this planet, it takes really long to get new oil and more and more people and other entities need oil. The reserves are running low and that process is speeding up. How does that compare to information.

"Intellectual property" is basically just the right to some piece of information, the right to say what happens with that information, who may do what with it.

Information is not what we'd call "scarce", actually we often hear people claiming that there is information overload, that people have the feeling of being bombarded with too much information. But maybe he's not really talking about information in general but about structured information: Searching Google Image search for a random word gives you buttloads of results, but are they good? Are they structured and reviewed? No. You have to find out about the license, about the quality all by yourself. So is structured information like oil? Or is the structure itself the oil?

The amount of structured information is conceivably lower than the amount of information in general but there is one, if not the most significant difference: If more people use the unstructured information we actually create more order, it might be by offering the users a way to tag and structure content or by them just putting images in more contexts (which makes it easier for automated classifications [and that is basically what a search engine does]). So in contrast to oil that gets less faster the more people use it, information actually gets better by more people using it. As do the structure that that information is embedded in. It's a resource that gets better and more plenty the more people participate. And that is why his comparison (whether he meant structured or all information) is wrong.

Information is not the oil of the 21st century.

Mr Getty is stuck in the old thought or property, where a resource that's scarce is getting more and more valuable, especially when it is important for society. But information (and therefore intellectual property) is fundamentally different: It's cheap and easy to produce, it's subjective (you cannot just put a meter in it and say whether the quality is high or not), it's getting better and richer, the more it is used and the more people participate (which in Mr. Getty's world would mean competition).

The only way to make intellectual property the oil of the 21st century is the way of the Apples, the MPAA and the RIAAs: Restrict people from participating in culture, in the creation of information. Restrict your right to say what you think, to modify and enrich culture. Block you from entering the content creation world cause you'd just create more of that precious "oil", maybe even give it away for free.

As long as there are Creative Commons, Copyleft and other free subcommunities creating content and information, it will never be new "oil". So whenever someone wants it be be like oil, you know what that person is fighting for and against: Your rights, your rights to say and think and create.

Intellectual property and information was no oil, is not oil and must never be.

May 05, 2008 07:36 PM :: Germany  

Py2exe and (Py)GTK

Just as a hint to save you the pain: Never assume that a normally installed Windows GTK works, it might cough up errors left and right with your Python and (Py)GTK that you have no clue how to debug. Rely on the hint given here and package your version of GTK (by copying the etc, share, bin and lib into your dist folder. You really save buttloads of time tracing bugs that you did not create and that waste your time.

GTK might be ABI stable, but the Windows Version is really weird sometimes.

May 05, 2008 07:15 PM :: Germany  

Clete Blackwell

Google SketchUp

Google’s SketchUp is an incredibly easy-to-use architectural and 3D-modeling tool. The Computer Science Club here at Mansfield has been talking about modeling the university for a 3D perspective in Google Earth, similar to what Google Earth provides for New York City and other metropolitan areas. Recently, I have been experimenting with SketchUp. A free version is available from the website and a professional version can be purchased for about $500. People enrolled in Universities can obtain the professional licenses for $50 a year. The $50 counts towards purchasing a full license, so after 10 years, it’s yours forever. Or, you can pay for the educational license for 3 years and pay the rest of the money up front.

At a first glance, SketchUp seems to be too simple to be worth anything. Upon further investigation, the simplicity seems to come from Google’s innovational perspective. Google has outdone themselves with SketchUp. It is amazingly easy to pick up and create simple objects. More complicated objects can be created with some practice. I have spent about an hour and a half working with the program. First, I watched the beginning tutorials. Then, I went straight into making objects and refining them. It’s amazingly simple. Just make a shape, pull it up to give it depth, draw other objects on it, and manipulate them. It’s amazingly simple.

In about twenty minutes, I was able to make the desk that I use here at school. Keep in mind that it isn’t 100% perfect, nor is it 100% to scale. I have never seen a program this simple. With an hour and a half of experience, I was easily able to make this (click to enlarge):

Here is the front of it:

From an angle:

From the side (notice the arches in the drawers):

And here it is next to a person:

May 05, 2008 03:39 AM

May 04, 2008

Martin Matusiak

OLPC about to self destruct?

I consider OLPC to be one of the most exciting initiatives of the last few years. When the idea was first circulated it was such an exciting call to arms to do something about the lack of education in poor regions of the world. And the project has produced what appears to be a pretty incredible product, the research of which is now recycled back into the general hardware industry, so it has brought advances that wouldn’t otherwise have happened (now).

I recall pondering the real purpose of the project, asking what is going to be achieved with these laptops. The OLPC project had a very good answer to this. They said the laptops will promote learning in areas where school books are a luxury. Furthermore, the laptop itself is completely tweakable, you press a special key and the source code of the current program pops up. This will promote learning through tweaking and experimentation, so that eventually an industry can be built on these foundations, in regions where little industry exists today and where perhaps the potential for one (in terms of natural resources) is bleak. A beautiful dream, one that could change the world in big ways.

Now Negroponte has changed his tune. Visionary that he is, he failed to convince the clients of the value of free software. So now he’s humming “forget open source, it’s all about the kids!” while preparing to run Windows on the laptop. There is a new smoke screen being constructed:

Negroponte says that the organization is working to ensure that Sugar can run smoothly on Windows.

Riiiight, running Sugar on Windows. Tell me, what exactly is the value of running Windows with an all free software stack? It’s completely useless, that’s what. The whole value of Windows is as a platform, not merely as an operating system. People buy Windows to run Windows applications, not for Windows itself. Or are we actually buying that Egyptian officials are eager to purchase Windows licenses in order to run the free software suite?

Congratulations, Negroponte, you’ve just become a licensed Windows vendor. The kids will no doubt have fun clicking on the Start menu and playing Solitaire. There is a great deal to learn from that, just nothing about the operating system or the applications, you know, actual learning.

OLPC in its original form was about empowering the users, with Windows that capability is entirely destroyed. The fact you cannot mix learning with trade secrets should be blindly obvious to anyone. Open souce is important, but it’s especially important when you want people to learn something.

Furthermore, learning doesn’t happen in isolation. It’s accelerated when it happens in a community of ideas and impulses that flow freely. Resigning OLPC president gets it when he says:

“What comes part and parcel with open source is a culture, and it’s the culture that I’m interested in,” he says. “It’s a culture of expression and critique, sharing, collaboration, appropriation.” And this culture can and should spill into classrooms, he says.

May 04, 2008 09:08 PM :: Utrecht, Netherlands  

Jan Tönjes

bash-Befehle

Mal eben zum festhalten:

Einfache Schleife
for i in `ls` ; do echo $i ; done

In Dateien suchen und ersetzen
cat filename | sed ’s/suchen/ersetzen/g’ > filename-new

Dateien umbenennen und hinten etwas wegnehmen
mv $i ${i%-new}

May 04, 2008 06:57 PM :: Lower Saxony, Germany  

Alex Bogak

Running tests on Windows.

Hi all

I need a free tool for testing a GUI application. Something in lines with Mercury's WinRunner.
Does anyone knows something like that?

Thanks

May 04, 2008 01:49 PM :: Israel  

May 03, 2008

Andreas Aronsson

Doubleclick links in terminal

For a very long while now, several years actually, I've been a bit annoyed by the behaviour of terminals under X when you doubleclick links. What the UI considers a word is selected. Selection 'starts' at the point that is doubleclicked and 'spreads' in each direction, stopping at a char it considers to be a word delimiter. A space is probably always considered a delimiter. Sometimes a '?' too, and often ',' as well. This has been very annoying for me as I spend quite alot of time in irc (irssi in a screen, its lovely in combination with bitlbee; icq, irc etcetc in the same screen.) and every now and then someone pastes an url which I want to doubleclick and then paste into my browser. Now the selection stops prematurely as it's not uncommon for a hyperlink to contain one of the characters that is in the word delimiter list. I've thought of this as a limitation to the system I use and, although annoyed, never gave it much thought. Maybe I've been to susceptible to propagandaists telling me gnu/linux is user-unfriendly.

A couple of weeks ago I started to think a little about it and the solution is rather simple. I use Eterm more or less exclusively.

In ~/.Eterm/user.cfg I've put this:

<eterm-0.9>
begin misc
cut_chars "\t\\\`\\\"\'() *,;<>[]{|}"
end misc

This might not be perfect but it's certainly served it's purpose this far as I have been able to doubleclick on the links and then middleclick in the address field (or open a new tab) in the browser. My OS is even better =)

May 03, 2008 01:06 PM :: Sweden

Michael Klier

What The Frack, Truecrypt?

Yesterday I've bought myself a new 250GB USB bus powered external hard-disk for my NSLU2. It replaces my bigger 3,5” which lives in a case and requires a separate AC adapter. I hope to safe some energy with this and get rid of the noise the bigger one made during the night.

Because the main purpose of the disk is to keep my backups and my digital audio library I went on to encrypt the disk using truecrypt, just like I did for the one before. I've never used truecrypt for anything else than mounting my old HD on my NSLU2 on which I run a self compiled 4.1 version of the software (at the time I encrypted my old disk there was no truecrypt package for the Debian arm port), so I never experienced the changes they'd made in the 5.1 version.

What should I say, IMHO the new version is a nightmare in terms of usability. It has a new Tcl/Tk GUI which should ease the management of encrypted devices. That might be the case for the Windows port but on Linux it results in just the opposite, especially on a headless machine.

If you want to use the text mode interface you have to explicitly force it on the command line by adding the -t option. Creating new encrypted devices also requires -t, if you omit it you'll get an error :-S. C'mon that really sounds like bad programming to me. The former cli interface of truecrypt was perfect IMO. I really don't know what has caused them to change it so dramatically. OK, there's a trick by putting an alias into your $shellrc to save you from future surprises and the ugly help window.

alias truecrypt='truecrypt -t'

Anyway, assuming that every user wants to use the crappy GUI by default is just plain wrong. Another example, in the old version you could mount the encrypted device without mounting its filesystem, for example if you wanted to format it with a different filesystem than FAT32 by omitting the destination mount point.

% truecrypt /dev/sdb1
Enter passwort:
% ls -1 /dev/mapper/
/dev/mapper/truecrypt0
% mkfs.ext3 /dev/mapper/truecrypt0

The new version isn't as clever. You have to omit the destination mount point and tell truecrypt not to mount it, or in other words tell it not to ask for a destination mount point because you didn't give one. Did they think: OK most users are not that smart, if they forget to provide a destination mount point we just keep asking them until we get one. Oh, and those who know what they do - well - lets add another cli switch so they can tell us that they really don't want to really mount the volume? The question about the missing destination mount point is not the only one. You're also asked for an optional key file and whether or not you like to protect the hidden volume.

To get the same effect as the above example you now have to use this easy to remember combination:

% truecrypt -t --keyfiles="" --protect-hidden=no --filesystem=none /dev/sdb1

As a side note: Since truecrypt uses FUSE now the devices don't appear in /dev/mapper anymore. You can use the following to list them.

% truecrypt -t -l
1: /dev/sdb1 /dev/loop0 - 
% mkfs.ext3 /dev/loop0

But the story doesn't end here, truecrypt now ships with another nifty gimmick.

I also wanted to create a hidden volume on the new hard-disk, the possibility to have hidden containers is what IMHO makes truecrypt a good choice for encryption. I know there are some controversial opinions on this matter, but anyway, check this out:

% truecrypt -t -c /dev/sdb1 
Volume type:
 1) Normal
 2) Hidden
Select [1]: 2
Error: The selected feature is currently not supported on your platform.

Erm what? I mean WHAT!? Are they kidding me? This worked versions ago. Although I bet this has something to do with the switch to FUSE, it seems that they decided to get the new fancy GUI version out in time (along with the added support for bootable encrypted devices on Windows) but also decided to ship the yet obviously unfinished rewrite of the Linux version.

I am sorry, but this just sucks!

Read or add comments to this article

May 03, 2008 12:13 PM :: Germany  

Muhammad Najmi Ahmad Zabidi

Random Heart

Graduate School Information Request


Your request for information has been processed.

Thank you for your interest in the University of Massachusetts Amherst.

Applications directed to addresses within the United States are mailed twice weekly with first class postage; allow 10 days for delivery. Applications directed to non-U.S. addresses are mailed weekly and sent air mail; allow at least 3 weeks for receipt. There is no charge for any of these materials.

The following materials will be sent to you here:

Department of Computer Science
KICT, IIUM
Gombak, 53100 MYS

  • CMPSC program materials

May 03, 2008 10:40 AM :: Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia  

Thomas Keller

Windows Media player doesn’t play all files

I have some strange issues recently with my windows media player - it does not play all video files any more (I have no problems on KDE with kmplayer,